Best Coast, When I’m With You [Single]

March 9th, 2010

Last semester I read Kirse Granat May’s Golden State, Golden Youth as part of a larger project about social and cultural change on ’50s, ’60s, and ’70s. The main thrust of her cultural history is that during the ’50s and ’60s California became *the* place for images of and ideas about youth culture. May spends a good deal of time examining Gidget and Disney to demonstrate how Baby-Boomer-era youth culture was affluent, white, and squeaky clean before giving way to scruffy beatniks and political dissidents in the late ’60s. An interesting angle in May’s argument is that Ronald Regan, as both candidate and governor in California, used the manufactured, clean-cut suburban teenagers of movies and television as the youthful ideal he would reinstate as soon as he cracked down on all those pesky mouthy unwashed Berkeley-ites, uppity colored folk, lazy poor people, etc.

Reagan’s legacy of culture-flavored smack talk aside, these shining, sunny California ’60s are still with us. These images provide access to ’60s style without the political baggage and obligations of LSD-derived “creativity.” Moreover, nostalgia for ’60s California can be used to highlight nostalgia for other kinds fleeting innocence. Of course, it doesn’t hurt that the Beach Boys’ lyrical concerns and candied vocal harmonies do a fine job of providing convenient shorthand for both California and not-quite-pin-downable longing and nostalgia.

Bethany Cosentino’s Best Coast suggests cheery California imagery by employing pop songforms of yesteryear. And the band’s lo-fi fizzy pop is filtered through a haze of reverb and distortion, heightening the feeling that it’s just out of reach. This fleeting vibe is mirrored by the evocative yet unspecific lyrics. Is “When I’m with you, I have fun” slight praise? An embrace of momentary pleasure? What do we make of the “I hate sleeping alone” that follows? One might argue that Cosentino channeling teen wariness and diffidence and employing them in blurry versions of teenage-type love songs to suggest the tensions between our memories of youthful love and the realities of less-than-permanent adolescent relationships. That could be a reach, though.

I had a hard time writing about this single. I got stuck on it and it derailed the blog for two months. I couldn’t quite sum up my feelings for Best Coast, nor could I move on and drop some cleaner commentary on a record I had a better handle on. I think I really love Best Coast’s stuff, but it seems dumb to really love a band, you know? Who has time for the same handful of songs when you’re supposed to be scouring the internet for the next next thing? And frankly, I like this stuff so much that *gasp* I almost don’t want to talk about it for fear of screwing it up. Anyway, seems kind of stupid and kinda fitting.

Okay, Okay

January 5th, 2010

Yes, I’ve sucked a lot at keeping this thing going. I’m resolving to keep up with a semi-regular posting schedule. Graduate school is a harsh taskmaster.

To make it up to you, here’s a blog-exclusive recording wherein I abuse the Beatles.

MP3: Thirteen Birds, “Doctor Robert”

Dead Man’s Bones, Dead Man’s Bones

January 5th, 2010

First, a confession – I don’t think I’ve been as actively geeked-out about a record as I am about this one for years. Thinking back, White Blood Cells and Moon and Antarctica probably provoked the same enthusiasm. Still, this record has hit me square between the eyes. I’m bonkers for it. I recognize that I have fallen for an inherently gimmicky thing here, an actor-led, vaguely-Halloween-themed phony indie musical sporting a kiddie choir. Nevertheless, I appreciate this record’s willingness to construct a very specific, obviously amateurish aesthetic out of odd bits of ‘50s rock and roll, pilfered Arcade Fire bombast, community theater musical numbers, and stray memories of Disneyland’s Haunted Mansion.

It weirds me out a bit that Dead Man’s Bones has made a record that collects many of my longstanding preoccupations — Halloween, shambly indie rock, liminal states, ships, cemeteries, growing up, retro pop — into one album. I’m not complaining. Increasingly I’ve become bored by a lot of rock and pop (indie and otherwise) because it is so sensible, so normal. This record avoids the big bad boreds by creating a little world all its own. And it is a little world. I mean, how many people are going to get on board a leaky rat-abandoned little disc like this? It is, after all, a high-concept, precious nerd-hammerish novelty record.

I’m not entirely sure what has prompted has prompted me to retreat, listening-wise, to the little bedroom between my ears. I don’t really go to shows anymore. I rarely discuss the bands/songs I really like, relying instead on theoretical discussions about “name” acts ripe for sacred cow tipping. Maybe it’s because I — like most everyone these days — take most of my musical medicine through headphones. We no longer have to put up with everyone else’s tastes and sounds and whatnot. Maybe that kind of insularity allows niche records like Dead Man’s Bones to take hold. Maybe I’ve forgotten what a proper pop/rock song is supposed to sound like, instead taking up with spooky, clattery records made out of the rags and bones left behind by what used to be popular music.

Perhaps it’s fitting that I’ve gotten tangled up with a record about ghosts and graveyards. Sometimes I wonder if I keep listening to pop music as sort of self-haunting. Some “researchers” into ghostly phenomenon suggest that hauntings aren’t really the result of restless souls pestering the living. Instead, they claim that hauntings are the result of a location being charged with excess emotional energy during a traumatic event. Maybe pop music is haunting me because once upon a time it was exciting. Or maybe I’m haunting pop music because once I used to be exciting.

Still, I’m not sure if I’m the only creepy critter out there unable to let pop’s past go. As those Horrors and Pains of Being Pure at Heart records prove, backwards-glancing is popular. And one of my recent favorite tracks suggests, perhaps it’s not all that uncommon to find love in the graveyard of pop past.

MP3: Veronica Falls, “Found Love in a Graveyard”

And let’s not even get into the endless parade of reissues, fame hall inductions, dead icon vault looting, reunions, and whathaveyou that are the very blood and guts of the fast decaying music industry. Sometimes even kind of caring about the goings on w/r/t popular music feels like brushing the teeth of dead monsters. Not to knock paleontology, but often thinking about, making, and enjoying pop-like music feels like working hard to get something new out of something old — which, of course, is only a “problem” because pop music has for so long made such a stink about its own “newness.” Rock and roll will never die and all that. Plus that famous promise to die before getting old. Seems a recipe for undeath and pallor.

Anyway, Dead Man’s Bones is my very favorite record of 2009. The bats have left the belfry. Here’s to another decade of zombie rock.

New EP + Excuses, Excuses

October 12th, 2009

First, good news — the new Thirteen Birds Teen Spirits EP is available for download! Click HERE. This little release features five more songs about teenagers, vampires, history, and whatnot.

The bad news — I’ve been really lousy at managing the Record Desk of late because I’ve started grad school and am still getting the hang of keeping up with my course work and my other work. I’ve got some new stuff en route that I’m excited to write about. You should see some seasonally appropriate material soon.

The Pains of Being Pure at Heart, The Pains of Being Pure at Heart

September 11th, 2009

The 09/09/09 Beatlemania thing has been a bit wearisome in terms of having to process all the “important” rock music that has been re-released. I didn’t run right out and buy both box sets or anything. I picked up the White Album because it’s an all time favorite. And I bought For Sale because it’s my current favorite Beatles sleeper record. It’s a slight record, a mixed record — about as “unimportant” a record as a band like the Beatles is allowed to have. I’ve also been dabbling with some home study versions of the mono mixes, sussing out the differences between the new “authentic” mono versions and the “sub-par” CD versions I know best.

Anyway, what impresses me about the Beatles pre-Rubber Soul (my mostly arbitrary point where the rock and roll Beatles stopped and the art Beatles began) is how slapdash and slight their records feel. Not that they aren’t well recorded or performed, but they’re recordings made for a disposable pop market. That something as fleeting as a disposable teen pop record could also be a little time capsule of real-seeming energy and enthusiasm is one of the great triumphs of mass-produced commercial pop culture. I can hem and haw about the “issues” I have with mass-market youth culture all day long, but listening to John Lennon and his band crank through Chuck Berry’s “Rock And Roll Music” is still a thrill.

The importance of the Beatles – especially the classic rock drug Beatles – sometimes obscures the fun to be found on Hard Day’s Night or Help. I’d wager that the “importance” of the social justice drug ’60s obscures the fact that the youth of that period remember it fondly because they were a catered-to market with enormous purchasing power and a whole world of new consumer goodies presented to them almost daily. I’ve often wondered how much of my own ideas of my youth (and the bits of my adolescence I paint with the summerglow brush of nostalgia) have been shaped by the ’60s ideas about and perfect teenhood nostalgia. The ’60s seem to have set the bar for all subsequent teenhoods. I mean, is the impulse to imagine the archetypal adolescent as suburban, white, sun-dappled, sensitive, and hungry for a wider world of authentic experience just a copy of a copy taken from all of the baby boomer understandings of what it meant to be a teenager during an untypical decade expanding consumer power and televised social change?

All of this brings us to the weird cult of imagined childhood, vicarious excitement, and re-created simplicity that is indie pop. I am, to an extent, a dabbler in and practitioner of this kind of twee fake simplicity and perma-adolescence myself, so I don’t mean this as an insult. Still, the world of insular jangle pop is built upon the foundations of other peoples’ (maybe not so real) childhoods. I’m not going to go into a complete history of twee/indie/jangle/whatever here. In fact, I’d mostly be cribbing from the very nice work that Pitchfork did on the subject a few years back (Pitchfork: Twee as Fuck – The Story of Indie Pop). Still, to connect the dots a bit, a lot of what the jangly nerd pop of the early indie/college scene was attempting was a recreation of that exuberant, joyous, innocent Beatle-esque pop rock.

As indie pop became an established form – and later a less-fashionable indie form – copies of copies or copies emerged. Bands rooted solely in indie sounds made records that didn’t so much aim for the Beatles or the Kinks but for the Field Mice and the Pastels. The Pains of Being Pure at Heart is a band and a record that is lovingly built out of sounds and ideas that come directly from the C86 sampler and other such indie high-water marks. Much like that Horrors record, knowing how this particular sausage is made is not enough to put me off my feed. Sure, this is a slight, derivative record — but that shouldn’t be an impediment to you getting your kicks. It’s not like jangle pop is about meaning and substance. It’s about a mood, specifically nostalgia. Does it sound exactly like “Emma’s House?” No. It does sound like a brighter, clearer remembering of all that perfect pop stuff from the yesteryear of indie land. I suppose that’s an achievement of sorts for an album-length celebration of a genre that’s fundamentally about conjuring a bittersweet feeling about the sorta imaginary past.

The Horrors, Primary Colours

August 19th, 2009

This record could easily be written off as an It Came from the Valley of Derivative Hipster Rock thing. The Horrors hit the scene as one of the gimmickiest NME “it” bands – all mock-shock camp horror goth garage pose without the tunes or the sound to prop up the image. Think lots of “Ooh, vintage!” organ and shouting. They kind of stunk.

So when someone suggested that I check out Primary Colours, I scoffed. When I was informed that the band had shelved the garage stunts and was doing a My Bloody Valentine meets Joy Division sort of thing. “Oh, great. More of that.” Commence eye rolling. Stylish retro brooding from the UK – whodathunk it?

Well, jokes on me because this is a neat little album. It’s not great. I couldn’t tell you what this record is about. You can throw a rock at any given song and hit something obviously nicked from the Jesus and Mary Chain, Echo and the Bunnymen, Joy Division, and My Bloody Valentine. However, as tight little collection of tracks, it’s both familiar and refreshing. Tracks like “Who Can Say” and “Primary Colours” are hung on catchy, minimalist hooks and dressed in high-style mope rock frippery. You’re not going to chuck your copy of Loveless based on this album, but it is nice to hear some of those fussed-over Kevin-Shields-type noises being employed in a pop context. Sure, “Scarlet Fields” is total shoegaze lite fluff, but that doesn’t prevent it from sounding good.

Worth checking out in a “key cut” sort of capacity is the final track “Sea Within a Sea.” The lyrics are mush like a lot of atmospheric mope rock lyrics. The main attraction is the song’s rather sprawling-feeling length (in reality only about eight minutes) and the driving motorik beat – both of which provide space for some guitars v. keys wrangling. There’s a nifty synth arpeggio bit and some reverbed “surfy” guitar. There’s a spare part, some ugly twisty mangled sounds, and then a gorgeous throbbing outro that eventually drifts away in a wash of electronic sound.

In short, not a mind-blowing, “change your life” sort of album. A modest, moody wisp of all the right sounds arranged smartly. Still, it’s not unsatisfying. It’s a bit like a great chunk of mopey candy.

Nirvana, MTV Unplugged in New York

August 9th, 2009

Recently I read Dave Cullen’s myth-busting, level-headed Columbine. I was in college when the event itself transpired. I recall being particularly interested in it, mostly because the coverage linked the shooting to teen angst and suburban rage and pop culture. Actually, I remember some cockamamie scheme that I was going to drive out to Colorado and poke around and write a book about Columbine. Of course, I never did anything of the sort – because I’m not actually the kind of person who seriously indulges his cockamamie schemes. Still, I was taken with high-concept teenage violence and the (erroneous) jocks v. weenies narrative and the (equally erroneous) rock and roll scapegoat business. I came of age in maudlin teenage times, after all – and self-aware ones at that. Columbine seemed a natural outgrowth of all that Heathers-Kurt Cobain-S.F.W.-style crap with some Tarantinoesque campy stock ultraviolence swirled in for good measure.

Of course Columbine was horrifically “real world.” But for most people it was a mediated event that existed in the realm of cable news (on endless repeat). September 11th has almost wholly supplanted Columbine as the big faraway unpredictable instant terror – likely because the footage was more horrifying, the socio-political impact greater, and the destruction much worse. Yet both incidents are similar in that they were planned for maximum shock value and achieved this impact through repetitious media coverage. The reality of the individuals killed and injured was soon overshadowed by the search for a “meaning” behind the events and by worrying about when and where the next, similar horror would come from.

Any big media shock generates mountains of noxious bullshit and speculation. In the fallout from 9/11, we have been visited by the “Truthers,” dubious justifications for pre-emptive warfare, cave-dwelling Bond villain terrorists, Anthrax scares, shoe bombers, and all other manner of unbelievable fright. It’s twelve minutes to midnight on the Wackadoodle Clock. It’s little wonder that zombies now plague internet prank culture. They’re no less ridiculous than people who unironically believe Zeitgeist – or the people who bought into the US Government as blameless victim of a Saddam/Osama Wonder Twins team-up. On a smaller scale, in the wake of Columbine, all manner of batshit nonsense washed ashore. The “Trench Coat Mafia.” All the handwringing about the myriad ways American culture had “failed” boys. The convenient “be nice to the freaks lest they snap” anti-bullying mandates. The public stoning of Marilyn Manson. The imaginary evangelical martyr who was shot because she said “yes” when asked if she believed in God. And of course, Bowling for Columbine.

These big happenings feed our fears back to us, recontextualizing them as “lessons” we can understand. September 11th confirmed the “presence of evil” in the world and the need for “action.” Columbine confirmed that teenagers are to be feared because they are shallow, cruel, and inscrutable. We “learned” that pervasive public surveillance or stricter gun control measures were needed to protect us. And then the next big thing happens and we forget about the details of whatever the last tragedy was. The only thing that remains of the previous horror is the broadest impression – devoid of nuance or real understanding.

I’ve been wrangling with this post for a while (see the previous entry), so it was odd to me that this post and my failure to finish it was one of the first things I thought of when I heard that John Hughes (Sixteen Candles, Breakfast Club, etc.) had died. When I was still a kid, John Hughes formed my ideas of what it meant to be a teenager. Sixteen Candles in particular provided a whole host of images and notions that I’m sure influenced how I acted out my own teenhood – the weird longing, the lurking about on the semi-popular rung of the food chain, the junior class warrior chip on my shoulder, the need to experience any emotional rawness as a personal crisis. And of course my tongue-in-cheek, half-joking “my parents ignored my sixteenth birthday” stories. In Hughes’ movies, teen-ness was a state of being, a performance (literally) that operated in a world where to be adult was to live with misplaced priorities or your head crammed squarely up your ass. This whole worldview is best summed up in Hughes’ teenaged Bugs Bunny Ferris Bueler who knew the score and could get away with just about anything while anyone who actually seemed to *CARE* about anything (working hard, delivering Ferris his comeuppance, living up to parental expectations) was upended, mocked, or forced to confront an unpleasant reality. Hughes certainly knew how teenagers like to imagine themselves – perpetually embarrassed by clueless adults, just an itsy bit on the outside but still mostly accepted, and in possession of the REAL knowledge of what matters in life.

John Hughes’ vision of perfect only slightly awkward teenhood is mostly a crock – as is the post-Columbine understanding of teens as scary, violent monsters ready to “go off” should adults fail to remove every possible trigger or trauma from their paths. In a popular culture that fetishizes adolescence as a source of both vibrant authenticity and uncontrollable power, it’s easy to forget that teenagers are first and foremost people. They’re not a collection of inscrutable buzzwords. Nor are they a great horde who need civilization imposed upon them. They’re people who are (by societal convention) given a sort of liminal period to “find themselves” and make choices about who they’re going to be. The advertising-driving mass culture in America is simply one source of potential identities available to these people whom we’ve told should be experimenting with masks and self-presentation.

During my last few teenage years, I became very interested in Kurt Cobain – not simply as the driving force in Nirvana as a band but also as a post-mortem famous person and icon. I remember the days after his suicide and the seemingly-endless footage of Nirvana’s MTV Unplugged performance. The warm, yet somber lighting, the lilies, the after-the-fact meaning possibly tucked away in the lyrics to originals and covers alike — “All Apologies,” “Come As You Are,” and “The Man Who Sold the World” come to mind. And of course that soul-bearing, heart-rending version of “Where Did You Sleep Last Night?” If one is given to the belief that Cobain knew that he would soon take his own life, it’s hard not to see this performance as final statement, one last act of self-presentation. It reminds me of my own petulant teenage thoughts, planning how I would kill myself and how what sort of note I would leave and how everyone would feel once I was gone. Part of Cobain’s enduring myth is that he, in his role as eternal teenager, he lived out this fantasy of making everyone miss him when he was gone. In the same way, Harris and Klebold lived out a teenage day-dream – making a big splash so that everyone everywhere would know who they were and how much they hated everyone’s guts. Just like Ferris, they were smarter than everyone and they got away with it all.

Where’s Thirteen Birds?

August 9th, 2009

As you may have noticed, things have been quiet on the ol’ blogstead of late. That’s because my creative firepower of late has been rerouted to the writing, creating, and recording of the very first full-length Thirteen Birds “record” Black Rabbit. Check it out over at http://www.thirteenbirds.com/recordings.htm.

I’ve been stewing over the next post a bit and it took a while for me to feel my way through what I wanted to say. With this project taken care of and a new EP coming shortly, I should be able to get back to blogging with some regularity. I apologize for any inconvenience. In the coming weeks I plan on doing some shorter-form more “review-like” treatments of albums I’ve been enjoying. Thanks for reading. Feel free (as always) to comment or email.

The Watersons, Frost and Fire: A Calendar of Ritual and Magical Songs

June 29th, 2009

In a completely unseasonal move, not too long ago I read two cultural histories of Halloween — Nicolas Rogers’ Halloween: From Pagan Ritual to Party Night and David J. Skal’s Death Makes a Holiday. Both books look at the grab bag of vaguely Anglo-Celtic traditions that merged with American-style commercialism, graphic design, mass media, and vandalism to produce the current late-October retail juggernaut. Along the way, both authors provide refreshers on bonfire night, Old World recreational fortune-telling practices, queer appropriations of Halloween masking, poison candy urban legends, and the like. If, like me, you’re a long time Halloween nerd, none of this is uncharted territory. One thing that did “click” for me was that (and I believe the Rogers book pointed this out) the festival from whence Halloween came (Hallowtide) was actually the beginning of Christmastide. Of course, the old timey Anglo-Celtic Christmas season was quite a different celebration than our current partly-Victorian-inspired carnival of wholesome consumerism.

Christmas, once upon a time, involved a lot more pranking, public rowdiness, and general transgressing than today’s “traditional” time of family get-togethers and material displays of affection. Various house-visiting practices and charity/begging took place across this long post-harvest holiday season. Souling and wassailing practices are often seen as the origins of modern trick-or-treating and caroling traditions. These now exotic traditions highlighted the places where the liturgical and agricultural calendars intersect. In today’s culture of commerce and Pop-focused mass media, “traditions” are usually just wholesome veneers constructed to support consumer practices. Any deep-rooted symbolism is often obscured by images and stories originating in cola advertisements or department store promotions.

Frost and Fire is an interesting collection, focusing as it does on the “Calendar of Ritual and Magical Songs” that was used to commemorate traditional seasonal celebrations. Of course, this album is a product of ‘60s “folk revival” tastes and ‘60s ideas about “authenticity.” I’m not really purist on these matters and certainly not an expert on British folk music/revival. What is appealing about this collection for me is that, to my rock/pop ears, the unaccompanied, roughish vocal harmonies singing of birds and wine and such sounds exactly how I imagine my beloved imaginary past to sound. It’s very “Olde England,” but unpretentiously without the curlicues and sonic adornments that connote Renaissance Fair. The overall effect is sort of a Plastic Ono Band version of medieval-ish ritual – a “Strange, Fey England” counterpart to the “Old, Weird America” found on the Anthology of American Folk Music and re-imagined by Dylan and his Band on the Basement Tapes.

I suppose that it’s fitting that these songs harkening back to liminal-season rituals also suggest the transition from a world where unique pre-industrial European and American traditional/regional practices existed in isolated pockets to a world where almost everything (including “tradition”) is mediated (by electronics, expectations, pop stardom, hype, etc.) such that entertainment and ritual are influenced by a commercial monoculture. I’m not lamenting the passing of some purer, simpler time – an era which likely never existed (or if it did exist was probably a trifle inconvenient and not nearly as quaint as I imagine it). Rather, I am interested in the ways which historical or traditional cultural memes mutate and live on. The self-consciously rustic Frost and Fire helps to organize ideas about seasons and traditional celebrations so that listeners can understand what they mean and how they function – much in the same way that Halloween helps Americans organize and understand immigrant traditions and pranking traditions and “fancy dress” parties that gave rise to the very American modern Halloween holiday.

I’ve listened to this album a lot since I bought it last year. Still, I can’t quite make sense of it or boil it down like I’d normally do with a record by a pop/rock group. I keep going back to it. Perhaps I’m being sentimental and don’t want to have at something that “seems timeless” or whatever. There’s a clarity to this album and to the nasal ring of the Watersons’ co-mingling voices.

Jarvis Cocker, Further Complications

June 1st, 2009

“I’m alive but I plan to die in the future”

A couple weeks ago I re-watched Todd Haynes’ Velvet Goldmine, the quasi-biographical examination of British glam artists who may or may not bear a striking resemblance to David Bowie, Iggy Pop, Marc Bolan, Brian Ferry, et al. Much like Haynes’ better received, better realized Dylan “biopic” I’m Not There, Velvet Goldmine mostly contrasts the liberating extra-factual mythology of rock and roll with the dourness of fact-hampered “reality.” Goldmine’s Citizen Kane construction lets viewers to muddle through the drab, phony fascist 1984 of the film’s events between numerous flashbacks that paint the early British ‘70s as an exuberant, sweaty, glittersmacked paradise. The “then was better than now” thesis is made visually obvious. There’s also a whole lot going on rock-trivia-nerd-wise, queer-theory-wise, and even Ewan-McGregor-as-Cobain-as-Iggy-Pop-wise. Still, without going down the fabulous glitter rock rabbit hole, I was really taken by the glamour vs. banality dichotomy Haynes sets up.

Particularly, I was struck by how totally Jarvis Cocker, both on his own and at the helm of Pulp, blurs the line between the two. His work seems mainly concerned with the banality of glamour and the glamorousness of banality. After all, Pulp’s biggest number was a class-baiting song about slumming.

My absolute favorite Pulp record is This is Hardcore – a dark glam record about sexual frustration, aging and death. Further Complications plays like a companion piece to that record. Where Hardcore was all lush Roxy Music lechery, Complications sounds like the first Stooges record – thanks in part to Steve Albini’s hi-fi but no frills engineering, I’m sure. It’s a wiry record. Hardcore was a hangover record, comedown, a waking up in your own fluids ordeal. Complications main thrust (heh) is about carrying on in the face of decay and adversity. It’s about finding something fabulous in doing all the ordinary, ugly crap we all have to keep doing if we’re still going to bother suck air every day.


From “Leftovers”

Trapped in a body that is failing me
Well, please allow me to be succinct
I wanna love you whilst we both still have flesh upon our bones
Before we both become extinct

Pop – with all its sex and glamour and generalized shakin’ it – is a young person’s game. And “young” is becoming younger all the time. It’s a con, of course. That’s what glamour is – a trick. It’s a fey spell. An enchantment. It’s the sort of thing that you chase like the Will o’ the Wisp only to wind up waist deep in the mire. Further Complications is the sound of dispelling the myth of pop.


From “I Never Said I Was Deep”

My morality is shabby, my behaviour unacceptable
No, I’m not looking for a relationship, just a willing receptacle

From “Fuckingsong”

I will never get to touch you so I wrote this song instead
Thinking about you lying in bed, it’s gonna get inside your head
And it’s the best that I can do, this is the closest I could get
So let it penetrate your consciousness

Essentially, Cocker is taking the whole business of pop stardom apart – the big sexual metaphor behind the curtain – and laying all the parts out on a tarp, precisely labeled. Of course it’s not just about the lyrics. A lot of the same ideas are communicated by the direct, unfussy rock sounds and structures upon which Cocker’s hung his lyrics. And Cocker’s vocal performances are certainly a bit more harried and exposed than on his more pop stuff. Heck, Jarvis himself summed up his theory in a 2008 lecture he gave on pop lyrics.


My core argument is that lyrics don’t really matter – they’re an optional extra, much like a sunroof or a patio. But when music and lyrics work together they’re better than the sum of parts. But that’s not all there is to it. Here’s the 1971 promo video from David Bowie’s Heroes which’ll illustrate my basic equation:

Music + Lyrics + Performance = Dynamite

Much like a film (perhaps Velvet Goldmine) a pop song is built of several parts and may wind up better than all of them. The meaning is somewhere is in the operation of the mechanism and not necessarily in the components themselves. Seems like an apt description of any human endeavor.

“It’s a complicated boogie” and all that.