Archive for April, 2008

Pearl Jam, Vs.

Wednesday, April 16th, 2008

I occasionally visit the musicians’ forums at www.harmony-central.com. This morning I popped in to check up on a thread I’d posted when one of the message headings caught my attention. Some kid was asking for advice on how to best nag his parents into furnishing him with a cell phone. Being a Luddite, my first response was to respond and tell the kid that he didn’t need no damn cellphone. Upon opening the thread, I found that a good number of folks had already offered the very same sound advice. My second instructive tidbit (”Get a job and buy yer own damn phone.”) was also well represented amongst the already posted. In short, it appeared that all was right with America on this particular April morning. Reading deeper into the chain of responses, I saw that the original poster had made some additional points in his own defense — the most memorable one being something like “You guys sound like a bunch of antisocial dudes who grew up in the ’90s.”

Yikes.

I’ve been 30 for a week and I’m already untrustworthy. Basically, I’m old and afraid that wolves will eat me. I am out of touch. I don’t *get* it. My gut response to the existential pain of this poor young consumer was essentially “Suck it up and get a job.” I’ve changed, maaaan. I mean, just look at this recent photo.

Abe Simpson or Thirteen Birds?

All kidding and sarcastic self-pity aside, was I ever THAT youthful? I’m thinking not. I was prolly more of a self-righteous pain in the ass. I was prolly more awkward and self-conscious. And petulant. Can’t forget the petulance. Of course the era of my teenness were also self-righteous, awkward, and petulant. The youth culture of the 1990s is (in the popular memory) marked by a certain sullen seriousness, an indignant moralizing tone inherited from the more puritanical underground youth cults of the embattled Reganite ’80s.

Let us consider the big-dog tide-turner album of the 1990s. Not the “Teen Spirit” album — we’re talking about the album turned highschools across the country “alternative” forever and ever. That’s right, I’m talking about the annoying, now uncool, unit-shifting Vs. The album sold 950,378 copies in its first week — I bought mine on cassette — and pretty much ruined “alternative rock” by making it as the dominant teen music in white suburbia. Vs. was the album that was different-sounding enough to be “alternative” but classic rock or hard rock sounding enough to push backwards-looking classic and hard rock purists like my buddies and me into the now. Vs. was my first foray into mass youth culture or liking what everyone else liked.

In junior high (Fall 1990 – Spring 1992) I started regularly purchasing music on my own. I’d always listened to my dad’s stuff as a kid — Neil Young, Jeff Beck, Springsteen, R.E.M., U2, the Who, Hendrix, etc. — and subsequently developed a taste for rock music that was a little “old” compared to that of my peers. When I started buying tapes, I got into Van Halen and Aerosmith and Ozzy and Zeppelin. These bands appealed to my already whetted appetite for classicist rock while having enough “metal” cred to ingratiate me to my poser rocker dude junior high friends.

I was already sneaking some R.E.M., Matthew Sweet, U2 and other assorted “wuss rock” bands on the side, but I didn’t admit it to my Slayer- and Metallica-worshipping friends. When Nirvana hit in 1991 I came *this* close to checking out Nevermind before I reaffirmed my proper rocker tastes and cozied up to the new Def Leppard release. Chicago was then and is now classic/hard rock territory, and I was too big of a weenie to cast my lot amongst the weirdo bands that were starting to crop up on Headbangers’ Ball between the “November Rain” and “No More Tears” vids. I’d had some exposure to the Replacements and local alternative sensations Smashing Pumpkins via WXRT, but for the most part I wanted my rock orderly and decked out in the appropriate signifiers of rockingness.

I spent the better part of my freshman year of highschool listening almost exclusively to the White Album. I’d heard that it was an important record, so I decided spend some time with it. I credit the Beatles’ self-titled with expanding my notions of what is acceptable within rock music. By the time I started my sophomore year in 1993, I’d picked up the Breeders’ Last Splash and Westerberg’s 14 Songs – both technically part of the alt-rock boom, but kind of marginal, semi-popular records.

I remember still being slightly skeptical of all of the alternative business swirling around — the messy sounding rock, the girls with kelly green combat boots and cough-syrup colored hair, the idea that you could just be a weenie or a nerd without having feign a macho pose to get by. Basically, my initial response was to reject all this stuff that challenged what I thought everyone else thought was “normal” or “cool” — even though I liked a lot of what I was seeing and hearing.

My conversion to the church of ’90s alternative youth culture came oddly enough during afternoon religion class (I went to a private Catholic highschool). I forget the context, but one of the girls played “Elderly Woman Behind the Counter in a Small Town” for the class and led a little discussion about it. I can’t remember he name now. She was incredibly tall, willowy with lots of sparkly, smudgy eye make-up. She smelled like cigarettes. She was the kind of older-seeming hard ass girl who scared the crap out of me when I was young — I was the token bookish “good” kid whose smart mouth got him in with the “bad-ish” crowd. (We all attended a suburban parochial school after all.) I remember her relating how the song reminded her of her dead grandmother, and she started crying. I bought my own copy of Vs. a few days later, no longer worrying how liking a certain band would make me seem.

Confession time — I don’t listen to Vs. that often any more. When it comes time for some Pearl Jam, I typically reach for one of the double-disc official bootlegs or all-time, all-time favs Vitology and Yield. A lot of the standouts from Vs. are now live show (and thus bootleg) staples. When I decided to give the album a spin the other day, I recalled the other reason why this one tends to stay on the shelf. I can’t listen to Vs. without having my adolescence rush back on me. Some of the songs are a bit strident and obvious now. “Glorified G” and “W.M.A.” are very earnest, very well meaning, very sophomoric songs. They’re kind of embarrassing.

I (like lots of folks) tend to use songs mentally to soundtrack random clusters of sense memory. This album is intensely sunny in my mind, like a lot of the “alternative nation” records of my early highschool years. Despite the dourness of a lot of the alt-rock bands, I remember the time as multicolored and energetic and most of all sunny — perhaps believing that you’re indestructible and that your self-satisfied, free-thinking goodness will prevent you from ever selling out makes every memory seem like a glorious late-summer afternoon. As I’ve become more cynical, I suppose that I don’t always feel up to re-experiencing the ardent, finger-pointing soundtrack of my naive teenhood.

Bringing this all back home, the whippersnapper who didn’t get why antisocial old farts like myself didn’t see why he needed a cellphone was prolly “right” on some level. When I was 17, you called folks and tried to catch them at home to make plans. Or you drove around in circles with a couple friends looking for something to happen. To pass the time, you listened to the radio or dropped by a record shop and scoured the used racks for something you’d heard might be cool. And when my parents or school or marching band or work interfered with driving around and shopping for used CDs and blowing money on fries and coffee at Denny’s, I’m sure I was a royal shithead. I certainly didn’t turn to the internet for reasonable advice. I prolly argued the rightness of my situation and stormed off to sulk, as was the style at the time.

As a “child of the ’90s,” I should remember what it’s like to be talked down to by a generation of moralistic know-it-alls who think they are cooler than and more self-reliant than any other group that has previously or will subsequently grace the planet. Sorry, kid. Or whatever…

R.E.M., Accelerate

Monday, April 7th, 2008

Tomorrow I will turn 30. I’m looking forward to it — a bit strange given how I’ve thought of all the birthdays between 20 and 29. I have this really long story that I like to tell about my 16th birthday. Frankly, it’s become increasingly maudlin cornerstone of my personal mythology. Long story short, my parents kinda ignored my 16th birthday because I was on an embarrassing marching band trip to Disney World. And after marching in the illuminated parade and dealing with all sorts of petty teenage emotional crap and school-related disciplinary nonsense, I found out that Kurt Cobain killed himself. As a result, I became very interested in Nirvana and usually spend the week of my birthday musing about suicide and how I should’ve done the proper thing and not lived beyond 27.

For some reason, I couldn’t get myself all worked up and mopey this year. I think passing from “it’s still possible” youngness into certifiable adulthood has taken the edge off. Which leads me to the reason why I’m writing about a late-period R.E.M. album. At some point in the last decade or so, during the promo cycle for one of their post-Monster albums, I remember hearing Peter Buck answer a question about getting old in rock and roll with something along the lines of “When you’re young, you do a lot of stuff on instinct. As you get older, you have to use your brain more to make up for your instincts.” I remember thinking that this was a fairly smart assessment, and — given that I’ve always been partial to using my noggin — it gives me hope that I’m well prepared as I enter my dotage.

Still, as someone whose medium of choice for interacting with the world is rock and roll, the idea of getting older is gut-level troubling. I’m a little scared that unnamed forces will sneak into my room tonight and write a big three-oh on my forehead in black Sharpie — lest anyone who holds dear that old Boomer adage about not trusting anyone over 30 be fooled. And given the sometimes fleeting merits of R.E.M.’s last two brains-over-instinct efforts Reveal and Around the Sun, I’d sort of written Mr. Buck’s comment off as merely rationalizing his band’s departure into the fussily produced, slightly dull sunset.

Accelerate, however, is an inspiration. I know that’s like saying a late-period Stones album is “an inspiration,” but I’m really enjoying this new disc. It’s a terse, smart album that plays to the band’s strengths and resists the temptation to “stay current” by piling on the electronic blips and twitters. Within the “youth rock” press (or blogosphere, if you must), I’ve seen an overall trend to downplay the merits of standard, rock-type music while focusing on how certain approved-of elements are untypical. But honestly, I didn’t start listening to rock and roll because it was weird or difficult or because it eschewed traditional songform. In general, I like the sound of the whole words + guitar equation.

I’m a little afraid that my current preoccupation with the clarity and directness of “Horse to Water” and “Living Well is the Best Revenge” is nothing by lazy listening and old age getting the better of me. But when I was a teenager, the things that really turned me on were smartipance rock songs oozing with loud, shimmery guitars anchored a solid backbeat. The bands I’ve really gone nuts for in my 20s — the White Stripes, the Libertines, Babyshambles, Trail of Dead, the Drive-by Truckers — are all working with these same basic ingredients. I guess I’m just too old to play at being bored by rock and roll.

Deep down, I know Kurt would understand.

Nick Lowe, Jesus of Cool (Expanded Yep Rock 30th Anniversary Vers.)

Monday, April 7th, 2008

A few years back, I was flipping through one of those massive Rolling Stone lists of “The Best Albums of All Time by People Who Make the All Time, All time Greatest Albums of All Time.” After I got done quibbling with the inclusion of Jagger’s Wandering Spirit as one of the ’90s best — it’s Jagger’s best solo effort, but c’mon — I noticed that I owned a sizable number of these supposed great works of canonical, Boomer-approved rockin’. Similar scannings of big lists by Spin or Pitchfork or whomever yield remarkably similar realizations. I’m never lockstep with year-end “Best Ofs” though. I suppose that my tendency as a listener is to seek out “important” releases — things that are established “classics” or notable examples of their genre or period. It’s not like I go record shopping with a tiny little Bob Christgau or David Fricke whispering in my ear, guiding my every purchase. But I often find myself wanting to know what’s up with records that are mentioned in all those High Fidelity-esque desert island lists. So much rock writing and rock fandom is focused on tastemaking and trendspotting and getting all gooey over the shock of the new. While I dig newness to an extent, my own predilection towards knowing history and allusion-spotting often leads me to track down the certified “great” albums.

As a result, I am a sucker for the meticulously packaged, overstuffed reissue versions of records that *maybe* 50 people purchased upon their initial release. And of course, that’s why I bought me some Jesus of Cool. Nick Lowe is most famous amongst the unwashed for being the dude who wrote that “…Peace, Love, and Understanding” song covered by Elvis Costello and his Attractions — a performance which requires a nuclear-powered irony detector if you ever want to cut through the layers upon layers of archness to get to something that could quite possibly be actual, real-live sincerity. Lowe was Costello’s producer of choice for his early records, as well as an artist on his own and as a member of Rockpile and Brinsley Schwarz. In short, Mr. Lowe was on and of the scene as “Pub Rock” and “Punk Rock” got all mixed up and became the marketable commodity known as “New Wave.”

I submit that New Wave (NW) and Punk Rock (PR) are forms largely interested in pop music and pop ethics and pop aesthetics as subjects. NW/PR are musics about music and about how folks should and shouldn’t react to different strains of popular culture/fashion. (Remember that the Johnny Rotten was picked to be punk because of his “I Hate Pink Floyd” t-shirt and that the Clash’s year zero manifesto “1977″ mainly targeted “Elvis, [the] Beatles, and the Rolling Stones.”) For my purposes, Nick Lowe would then seem the perfect punk — at least on Jesus of Cool. The album’s two titles Jesus of Cool and the American version’s Pure Pop for Now People are stunts. The album cover depicts Lowe in various parodic versions of established rock costume. Promotional schwag (kindly pictured in the deluxe reissue version’s liner notes) released to support the album irreverently mocked religion, the cheekily pompous album title, and the artist himself.

Jesus of Cool

Moreover, the a good chunk of the songs on the original Jesus of Cool album and accompanying bonus materials from the same time period are about music and the music business. “Music for Money,” “I Love My Label,” and “Shake and Pop” are obviously tongue in cheek examinations of rock happenings that were already clichés by the late 1970s. “Rollers Show” is a paean to the greatness of the Bay City Rollers.

Even seemingly “not about music” songs like “Marie Provost” are partly about music. “Marie Provost” is titled like a typical powerpop “girl song” and initially sounds like one — ooh-wah-ooh vocals, a melodic bassline, and driving, strummy guitars. However, a closer listen reveals lyrics about a woman who died and was eaten by her dachshund. The song provides one set of expectations and then confounds them when the lyric doesn’t match the music — a joke that requires the listener to know the conventions of pop music.

NW and PR are polarizing styles because they changed the rules of popness. Before punk, “cool” culture was in opposition to establishment culture. This conflict often manifested along class lines (greasers v. socialites) or generational lines (youth vs. parents). However, as marketing and success and time made rock and roll an establishment item, a new, more nebulous conflict arose. Certain styles of rock and roll became enshrined and “classic” and, in a way, respectable. As a result — if we’re inclined to believe the party line on “The Punk Rock Movement” — new variants of rock crept in to challenge the established versions of rockness. In short, the conflict became a battle of one type of listener/fan versus another. Punks mocked classic rockers. Classic rockers bitched about disco.

However, a document like Jesus of Cool suggests a more nuanced development — mainly that NW/PR saw rock and roll coming to terms with self-awareness and irony. Rock became a set of values and tropes to think about in critical terms rather than something that would simply “never die” or continue “round the clock.” One might posit that Lowe is impishly tweaking rock and roll conventions because an audience exists to get the joke — enough rock history exists by 1978 that one can assume an informed audience.

In a way, Jesus of Cool and other “important” albums from the same PR/NW era mark the point when rock and roll lost its innocence on a wide scale. Just seven years after the punk explosion in 1977, enough people were thinking critically and playfully about rock cliché that someone made a movie about it — 1984’s Spinal Tap. Punk introduced a caste system of cool; commercially-successful records by well-established stars were less cool than sloppy, unknown albums that were never played on the radio. In many ways, rock began to emulate the “high” art world’s eye for the avant-garde and academia’s (over-)emphasis on smartness and obscureness and the tastes of a niche audience.

Which begs the question — do I own the super-fantastic, lavish reissue of Jesus of Cool because I actually enjoy this kind of music or because it helped usher in an era wherein rock listeners add albums to desert island lists because they like the smart feeling they get when they recognize the Thin Lizzy homage that is “So It Goes” and the little bit of “Heart of the City” that sounds like that song Joe Strummer’s first band put out?