Archive for December, 2008

Smashing Pumpkins, American Gothic (EP)

Thursday, December 18th, 2008

Billy Corgan reminds me a bit of Pete Townshend. He just can’t seem to escape his own preoccupation with the band he built. Moreover, he seems torn between smart, sensitive expressiveness and the abandon of all-out sonic assaults. And nevermind that he’s a pretentious “art-teest” whose conceptualism seems to blow up in his face about as often as it pays off. That he does his screwing up very much in public only makes the comparison easier.

The reanimated semi-Pumpkins 20th Anniversary jaunt has been memorably declared “a shitshow” by Pitchforkmedia. And truth be told, Zeitgeist — a few cool tracks aside — is a sludgy, samey bummer. These missteps have been amplified by Corgan’s famous inability to shut his trap. Rather than biting down hard and carrying on, he’s taken every possible opportunity to make bold, ridiculous proclamations — from his full-page ad in the Sun Times announcing his intention to reform the Pumpkins to his recent “no more albums” promise to NME

There is no point. People don’t even listen to it all. They put it on their iPod, they drag over the two singles, and skip over the rest…

Our primary function now is to be a singles band, that drives Pumpkins Inc through singles. We’ll still be creative, but in a different form.

Corgan does seem to be grinding some kind of axe w/r/t his once-and-future band not being taken seriously as a long-playing threat. The “shitshow” designation was largely a reaction to this hometown “meltdown” at the Chicago Theater.

Chicago Sun Times critic and frequent Corgan nemesis Jim DeRogatis supposes that the Corganmonster’s current public bad behavior is a conceptual stunt —

It’s only guessing, once again, but I’d say it’s all part of a statement
he’s trying to make about the reconstituted Pumpkins NOT being an oldies
act, alternative nostalgia or otherwise, and it is in fact on some
dramatic, horribly painful but ultimately brilliantly worthwhile odyssey
of its own, just like the old band. Remember, in his world, Smashing
Pumpkins tours are ordeals far more trying than any military campaign,
outdoing the misery even of Napoleon’s infamous retreat from Moscow. And
if they aren’t, they’re not worth doing. (See: Zwan.)

Read DeRo’s whole bloggy thing…

By my estimation, Corgan is just being a bit petulant and passing it off as a “concept” to dodge criticism. I remember seeing Townshend on some rockumentary bitching about how “all his friends are dead.” He had a point, but he was also being a whiny crank. Corgan seems to be doing the same thing here. Remember this is the guy who blamed Britney Spears for the Pumpkins break-up and whose recent critiques of American in the end times run about this deep…

That's hot...

President Cheney?

What’s frustrating about watching Corgan struggle with his conceptual nonsense and big time rock ambitions is that his work is always best when he’s not trying so hard. Case in point, the relaxed, bootleg-only Machina II record has proven a much more enduring rock record than the forced, over-produced Machina.

In the early days of Zwan, Corgan and company played a number of small gigs showcasing a surprising number of sunny, ringing rocksongs. On top of these songs, the band’s second incarnation as the Djali Zwan was an outlet for acoustic material often rooted in American roots styles. Bootlegs of these Zwan performances reveal a band having fun playing to appreciative audiences in close quarters. I saw Zwan twice, once at Double Door before the release of Mary Star of the Sea and once at Metro in support of the album release. The Double Door show was a loose, engaging performance. The Metro show was a bit more “showbiz.” It’s a shame that Zwan fell apart before they could release the acoustic Djali Zwan material. From what I’ve heard, it’s some of the best and easiest-to-take Corgan material.

From Live at The Intersection 12-13-2001

MP3: Zwan, “Candy Came Calling”

MP3: Zwan, “For Your Love”

I’m not saying that Corgan’s been completely wasting his talents of since chucking Zwan. I do wish he’d released the rumored acoustic concept record about Illinois rather than the labored retro mope rock of The Future Embrace. Even now with the Pumpkins, Corgan does manage to ease off the throttle and simply record a pleasant song once in a while. The best song on my copy of Zeitgeist (I have the Target version) is the tacked-on bonus track “Zeitgeist,” a simple acoustic number that cuts deeper that the previous hour of blazing guitar nonsense. And having been mostly disappointed by Zeitgeist, I was again pleasantly surprised when I heard this new acoustic number he’s done with the New Pumpkins.

VIDEO: “99 Floors”

I can understand why Corgan — who basically made his career on a really big guitar noise — might be unwilling to pack in the sturm und drang in favor of plain the old strum and clang as a singer/songwriter type. Nevertheless, his best stuff seems to come when he sticks with the dreamy stuff that has always been part of his formula.

For your consideration — American Gothic, a four-song stopgap released via iTunes in the States and on disc in Europe, is understandably a bit slight. It’s not a “major” statement like Zeitgeist was intended to be, and it’s all the better for it.

“The Rose March” is a comfortable listen, finding Corgan embracing the drowsy psychedelic feel of vintage Pumpkins a la the soft stuff on Siamese Dream or Mellon Collie. The lyrics are mostly mush, like much of Corgan’s writing. Still, this seeming problem doesn’t really detract because the words are mostly there to provide sound and the occasional romantic image. “Again, Again, Again (The Crux)” is a “Tonight, Tonight” type declaration of longing. Gish-era light grunge rears its head on “Pox.” And “Sunkissed” returns to the dreamland of tracks like “Thirty-Three” or even “Galapagos.” In short, this little collection is nothing new from Billy Corgan and Jimmy Chamberlin, which is precisely why it isn’t a shrieking horror. It’s natural. It’s Billy Corgan music that sounds like Billy Corgan.

What is irritating about trying to follow Billy Corgan’s career is how frequently he defeats himself, how often he ignores what he does well to do something shallowly “Artistic.” He and Chamberlin could easily record album-after-inviting-album of expertly-recorded folky psychedelia. They could build themselves a nice catalogue of well-respected songs. Instead, Corgan persists in the self-serious boy-in-a-dress adolescent shenanigans that had grown tiresome back in 1995. Almost as irritating is that Corgan cannot be entirely written off because he is occasionally releases quite beautiful and/or exciting. If only he’d ditch the games and just be himself — even if that self is a 40-something bald, religiously-minded Midwestern singer/songwriter who used to be a rockstar.

I hope I die before I become Pete Townshend, indeed.

Detachment Kit, Of This Blood

Monday, December 15th, 2008

One of the best things I ever saw was a Detachment Kit show at the Empty Bottle in Chicago. If I recall, it was a sparsely attended show because it was super-freaking-cold out – that kind of cold where you hold your breath as you dart from the car to the door because you can feel your insides freezing whenever you do suck air. There might have been 20 people tops at the Bottle that night, counting the staff and the bands.

The Detachment Kit seemed to have prepared for a much larger turnout. They always came armed with wacky theatrics whenever they played (costumes, capes, fake blood, etc.), but for this particular show they had wrapped every little bit of their gear with aluminum foil so that it looked like someone had staged a mock moon landing on the Bottle’s stage. There was also a trampoline positioned just in front of the stage. It seemed a shame that so much gimmicky effort had been made for such a small crowd. Despite the lousy turnout, DK put on a ripping good show – fearsome amounts of energy, lots of confrontation, and loud to boot. It was one of those shows that was so mesmerizing that you don’t remember particular songs or sounds so much as you walk away with a head full of stray images and the impression that you witnessed something feral and vital. Just writing about this show some six or so years in the past gives me a little adrenaline jolt.

I saw Detachment Kit one more time after this show when they were touring with My Morning Jacket. They were good, but they’d normaled up a bit – likely because they were playing a supporting slot. The band is still a going concern, now based in Brooklyn. They self-released a record a few years ago that I neglected to pick up. Despite the band providing one of my best rock and roll experiences, I’ve mostly lost touch with them. In fact, I’d kind of let Of This Blood slip my mind prior to running across it the other day when I was scouring the Record Desk for some misplaced disc. It’s a shame too, because this album is a solid little disc of punky, arty rock.

On whole there’s nothing too original going on with Of This Blood. If you’re familiar with Modest Mouse and Fugazi and that style of guitar-driven, spazzy indie rock, then this record will be pretty easy to take. Still, the tightness and conviction of the performances serve as a reminder of how good this kind of ardent, pointy music can be. Theoretically, this album is some kind of concept-ish piece where the songs bleed into each other, but I’ve yet to figure out exactly what the concept is supposed to be. The album art features a primitive board game pitting players against a “Queen Beaktapus.” Perhaps a more dedicated Detachment Kit fan could figure it out, but I suspect it’s mostly nonsense.

Ack!  Queen Beaktapus!

For my money, the best tracks here are they super-pretty “Ricochet” with its swooning guitar and mostly murmured “emotional” vocals and the woozy, Radiohead-biting “Ice Queen.” Both are on the softer side of the Detachment Kit spectrum. I think these songs stand out because they are actual songs, the louder, funner stuff feels more like fits of riffing interrupted by the occasional manic vocal spasm. They don’t really “mean” a whole lot, which is probably why this side of the Detachment Kit makes for such a great concert happening.

As “indie” taste has shift from rock to more twee- and folk- and dance-inflected sounds, I’ve started to miss offerings like Of This Blood. Willfully messy, semi-pretentious rock music can grate just as much as the cutesy Juno-soundtrack-lite stuff, but there’s at least some “oomph” with the noisy artschool stuff. I mean, Of This Blood is no all-time, all-time best record ever. Still, it’s got some zazz. The zippy churn of “When You Need…” and the Sabbath-friendly guitar sizzle of “Roots Rock” do get the blood pumping. After all, I still like loud. And I especially like it when it’s wrapped in tinfoil and spitting fake blood.

Kanye West, 808s & Heartbreak

Wednesday, December 3rd, 2008

I have a soft spot for phony records — what I like to call “false rock.” I’ve thrown this term around for a few years without ever defining it. Wimpily, I usually fell back on the “I know it when I hear it” excuse whenever anyone has asked me what exactly I meant by “false rock.” For instance, Ryan Adams’ Rock’N’Roll is a false rock record. R.E.M.’s Monster, too. And U2’s Zooropa. T. Rex’s Electric Warrior might be as well.

Before anyone gets in a huff, please note that I desperately love these records. They’re some of my very favorite records. They’re near perfect. They contain an entire WORLD within them, or rather they contain an entire set where you might film a movie about a totally artificial and fantastic world populated by robots and laser mice and witty holograms. What I’d say these albums have in common is their obvious, intentional bigness. Also, they’re not “serious” records in terms being overly concerned with songcraft per se. These records have some very good songs on them, but they don’t strike me as fussy, over-considered songs. Rather these “false rock” records strike me as inspired elaborations on a conceptualized sound. They seem like pop art experiments in a way, attempts to make something both shockingly individual and fully commercial. Just consider the boldness of the titles and the album covers. They’re very direct. Iconic almost. Like a cereal box or pop can.

null

In many ways the flatness, the brightness of the music and packaging of these “false rock” albums seems Warholian to me. It’s overtly Pop stuff. Maybe this is what seems phony or “false” to me, this emphasis on surface and boldness and stylized commerciality.

As sounds, as packages, these big fake albums are big on allusion. On Monster, Stipe throws around references to Dan Rather and Kurt Cobain and finally offers to “be your Iggy Pop” over sound beds obviously cribbed from glam rock and grunge. The title track from Zooropa is lousy with pilfered ad slogans and sounds from Bowie and Eno’s Berlin period. Adams’ Rock’N’Roll is the sound of a once-upon-a-time enfant terrible mimicking the sounds of retro/revivalist bands whose best ideas belong to decades long past. And nevermind that Adams gives a number of his smartipance tracks the same title as established rock classics/hits.

And Electric Warrior – this record could very well be the source of “false rock” with its rockabilly-meets-American-Top-40-meets-Dylanesque-wordplay-meets-psychedelia choogle. It’s a record that is so very much EVERYTHING that it winds up as no one thing in particular. Electric Warrior is a clever album. It challenges you to a game of spot the influences. And it’s a certainly bit camp. I suppose that campiness is something all proper “false rock” albums share. Perhaps “false rock” is merely my own way of talking about records that employ the glam rock techniques established by Electric Warrior (i.e., self-awareness, campiness, lyrical and musical allusiveness, knowing post-modern simplicity/minimalism, etc.) outside of the narrow time and place of glittermania and T.Rextasy as going concerns.

Why all this dilly-dallying? What do these boring old rock records have to do with the Kanye West’s 808s & Heartbreak and its well-known, oft-reported back-story? Well, I suppose I’m trying to work through my little “false rock” concept because 808s & Heartbreak is, by my reckoning, a “false rock” album much more than it is a forlorn break-up record or a soul-bearing “fucked-up superstar” record. It’s a stylized, Pop Art version of a bleak, sad record. I’m not saying that West wasn’t feeling bad when he made it, but his sad robot music doesn’t have the real emotional fire and sonic raggedness of Joy Division’s Closer or Lennon’s Plastic Ono Band or Nirvana’s In Utero or Neil Young’s Tonight’s the Night. Nor does this record have the clarity and bitterness of my very favorite break-up record Blood on the Tracks. West, by my ears, just doesn’t sound at the end of his rope on 808s. He’s simply wearing an expertly-crafted designer mope mask.

One of the reasons why I find Kanye West compelling as a pop star is because he seems to be consciously angling for the role of hip hop’s Elvis Costello – the smart, winking artist with a firm grasp of pop history and a willingness to toy with convention. I like glam and punk because they’re forms based on breaking the fourth wall. And I like West because he’s willing to break mainstream hip hop’s pretentious, cred-obsessed fourth wall.

808s finds West intensifying his expressions of ambivalence towards to the conventions of hip hop boasting and materialism – an ambivalence that has always been part of his shtick. E.g. from “Welcome to Heartbreak”: “My friend shows me pictures of his kids/And all I could show him was pictures of my cribs.” Under the usual circumstances of a “typical” Kanye West offering, I’d consider this admission as just another snippet tucked in amongst the party songs and the wild hyperbole as a way to reinforce his image as a self-aware, conflicted artist. But within the context of 808s & Heartbreak’s complete image/sonic overhaul, I find it interesting that the one previously-established element of West’s persona that carries over into this new construction is his vision of himself as isolated superstar, as Midas imprisoned in/by his golden kingdom.

I suppose what put my on the scent of 808s & Heartbreak as a “false rock” record was its being an album-length exercise in image overhaul. Like the previously mentioned albums, 808s finds an established artist remaking himself by picking out new influences and then packaging his new identity for ready consumption. It’s not enough for West to dabble in vintage synths and Daft Punk samples. He has to doll himself up in a little grey New Wave suit and retro glasses.

Don't let the bullies take my lunch money!

He’s playing the Sad Black Prince to Bowie’s alienated Thin White Duke. If the dance-inflected mope, wavering vocals, and vaguely post-punk feel of tracks like “Say You Will” and “Love Lockdown” weren’t enough to suggest New Order, West makes his Factory Records influence apparent with an album cover that could comfortably sit on the shelf next to Power, Corruption, and Lies.

808s & Heartbreak

808s & Heartbreak

Power, Corruption, and Lies

Power, Corruption, and Lies

In short, this album that is being billed as intensely personal and “private” is actually a bit of studied simplicity and artificial sound meant to reimagine the public West as a pop star who has been transformed by personal loss and emotional darkness. It’s a neat trick – making yourself sound cold to appear warmer for having done so. After the first five bleak cuts on 808s, the poppy respite of “Paranoid” and the soaring phony strings and fake-Springsteen xylophone on “Robocop” are wholly refreshing.

By claiming emotional turmoil, West is able to jump genres and become a new pop star unfettered by the expectations of hip hop success/convention. He’s making a bid for art rock cred by making an art rock record that pushes all the right buttons (i.e., the right influences, thematic cohesiveness, personal pain fueling the creative process). If you have any understanding of pop culture, you can see what he’s up to. Still, it’s fun to hear. Perhaps I’m perverse, but I think I enjoy 808s & Heartbreak more for being able to see how it’s put together. I think that’s part of the kick I get out of these “false rock” records – they’re obvious and honest in their obviousness. You can see the artists at work, as they creating a commercial collage without the usual pretense of art being some kind of personal accident born of mysterious specialness.