Archive for April, 2009

The Breeders, Fate to Fatal

Tuesday, April 28th, 2009

Kim: No, we were off 4AD after Title TK. And then we had Mountain Battles, and it’s like, well, we’ll do it on 4AD. But that was a one-off. [4AD has not yet confirmed that the Breeders are no longer signed to the label. -- Ed.] And for this one, it’s an EP. What am I going to do, take a meeting for an EP? Then we’re like, maybe we should just give it away anyway. It’s on sale on iTunes, but I don’t know if anybody buys digital music. Maybe they will, and maybe we’ll actually be able to sell something, but that’s not the point. Music is free.

I don’t know if anybody’s going to buy it. I assume one person will download it, and everybody else will steal it. I have no idea what people do nowadays. People might actually buy digital music. Do you know if they do?

Pitchfork: I buy off iTunes sometimes.

Kim: [To Kelley] He says he buys digital music off iTunes. [To Pitchfork] Kelley says you’re lying.



Kim:
I don’t see the drawback yet. Like I said, music is free, so who cares? It’s not like we’re in a rap band and I really need someone to sponsor my hundred-thousand-dollar wardrobe and car. I don’t know. Maybe it’s a really stupid way. Maybe by doing this now we have just leveled ourselves, like [whispering] we’re a band who lost their label contract. Or maybe people actually think that if a band doesn’t want to use a label, they just don’t want to use a label anymore. Because labels don’t exist anymore. Do you think they do? I don’t.

Kim Deal in a 2009 Pitchfork interview

I absolutely love the Breeders. They were the band that gave me that last final shove outta my identity as a mostly a classic and/or hard rock listening guy who dabbled in alternarock, into being a guy who was mostly interested in alternarock and later punk and glam and what many people would now call “elitist” smartipance music. Don’t get me wrong. I listened to R.E.M. and a little Pearl Jam or Smashing Pumpkins, but the summer of ’93 is when I fell hard for what then seemed like “weird” bands to a Midwestern kid who listened to Aerosmith, Van Halen, and the Beatles.

It’s easy now to think that a committed music fan would seek out the willful, the quirky, and the odd. But when you’re 15 years old and every single bit of music you hear must be filtered through commercial radio, MTV, or word-of-mouth recommendation, your tastes move slower. There were no college radio stations in the far southeastern suburbs of Chicago. Heck, my college didn’t really have a radio station that played what is generally thought of as college rock. This totally wired infotainment age of ours has certainly made the word smaller. Folks making their homes in pop cultural dead zones like the not-urban Midwest are no longer doomed to hearing about things way after the fact. Heck, if anything, the internet gives anyone anywhere the opportunity to be the first person to backlash and pooh-pooh a brand new song/meme/band/idea. Something better be polished or professional, or blindingly innovative if you expect the internet to get on board.

The inversion of standards brought on by internet culture (and a savvier pop fandom in general) doesn’t feel entirely comfortable to me. I suppose that the extreme-ing of everything in the 1990s helped create our appetite for endless edginess and pop culture products that “cross the line” more often than not. Perhaps this extreme-ing influence has split into several strains. One strain being the obvious crassness that fuels the popularity of shows like Family Guy and mainstream pornification and a lot of other cultural ephemera that I can’t help but associate with those serious-looking energy drinks at the convenience store. Another variant of extreme-ness is indie snobbery – the need to hear of and discard first minor cultural happenings that almost no one will ever like in the first place. A lot of the energy drink people would consider indie snobbery to be elitist, and the snobs would likely consider the energy-drinks-and-tribal-tattoos people militantly populist and vulgar (in several senses of the word). I reckon it’s kind of a counter/pop-culture “red state v. blue state” thing.

I certainly don’t exist outside of these debates. I once conducted an animated (and, no doubt, slurred) argument in defense of the Shangri-Las’ “Leader of the Pack” in the general direction of my aggro-metal loving brother-in-law. He totally didn’t get it. “Leader of the Pack” is old-fashioned sissy music. How could I like that? In his defense, I didn’t get it either. I was trying to argue taste. I was trying to “improve” his understanding of pop music. It was a dumb argument – and I’m guessing a pretty common one.

This argument happened about 10 years ago. However, it sticks with me because I learned an important lesson – nobody wants to have their taste “fixed” for them. I didn’t experience an immediate epiphany, but I learned to roll back on the intensity knob when it came to arguing about taste.

Over the last year or so, I’ve been contemplating entering graduate school. As part of this process, I’ve had to take stock of what it is that actually interests me, what topics I’m passionate enough about to invest time and money into studying seriously. As an added bonus, I’ve spent some of this time thinking about what really flips my switch – what the core things are that I really love and that really got me into music and history and culture and books.

The Breeders are one of those things.

I’ve been on a bit of a Breeders and Pixies binge lately. When I found out that the Breeders were releasing a new EP I was psyched. Few things are better than learning that a band that you’re reconnecting with is releasing a new record. Fate to Fatal is an unassuming, homemade kind of record. As on the underrated Title TK and the most recent long-player Mountain Battles, this EP finds the sisters Deal sounding mainly like you expect them to. Rhythms chug beneath cooed, slurred vocals. Guitars sputter and pop. Strummed electric guitars shift in and out of time, eking out a delicate melody. Even the Bob Marley cover “Chances Are” sounds unmistakably like the Breeders. The only potential surprise is “The Last Time.” Instrumentally, the hushed, chimey pulse occasionally interrupted by a sloppy, trebley sheet of guitar noise wouldn’t be out of place on any previous Breeders album. It’s Mark Lanegan’s diva turn that stands out. The Breeders sound is built upon the interweaving Kim and Kelley vocals, so the vocal switch is unexpected.

Fate to Fatal is a slight release. Yet its very inessentialness makes it appealing. The whole self-released, homemade (even down to the hand-screened record sleeves) approach to record making touches on what makes a band like the Breeders special – they’re unpolished, they’re not untouchable rock celebrities. If Kim and Kelley deal can forge an identity in sound, then why can’t any committed, inventive person?

I suppose it’s the implicit democracy of the form that lead me to believe deeply in “alternative” or punk or whatever it was that turned me on when I was 15. It certainly wasn’t an elitist thing, an “I know about XYZ and you don’t” thing. It was about connecting with sounds that reflected how I felt – weird, shambly, wimpy, awkward, clattery, sarcastic. Last Splash didn’t make cool into something that required macho, phony cool. Unkempt Midwesternism could be just as compelling – just as charming – as high kicks and leering rock guy posturing.

It’s tempting to dismiss Fate to Fatal as an unimportant vinyl trifle, to give it a numerical score and cast it aside as not hotshit enough for these picky times. But the Breeders aren’t built for that kind of listening. Even at their loudest, they’re a quiet sort of band. I think you’re supposed to listen to this record and let it seep in.

Not that I’m telling you how to listen.

Pete Townshend, Empty Glass

Friday, April 10th, 2009

“I hope I die before I become Pete Townshend,” wrote Kurt Cobain in his journal in the middle of one of his rants against the rock press establishment. Why? Because I had become a bore? Because I had failed to die young? Because I had become conventional? Or, simply because I had become old? In fact, in the early Nineties, when Kurt was struggling with himself over whether or not to do an interview with Rolling Stone magazine, I was not boring, neither old nor young, and I was not dead. I was, unlike Cobain, hardened. Tempered, beaten and subjugated by all that rock had delivered to me and via me over 30 years. Rock is, I think, particularly hard. And in this statement Cobain appears to be hard on me. But perhaps he is sad for me?

***

It is desperately sad for me to sit here, 57 years old, and contemplate how often wasteful are the deaths of those in the rock industry. We find it so hard to save our own, but must take responsibility for the fact that the message such deaths as Cobain’s sends to his fans is that it is in some way heroic to scream at the world, thrash a guitar, smash it up and then overdose.

– Pete Townshend’s reviewing Cobain’s Journals

I firmly believe that rock and roll can save your life – though if that’s the case, I’m not sure your life was worth saving.

– Me (during some snark spasm or another)

Conveniently for me, my birthday coincides with the annual soft-focus reminiscing on the passing of rock martyr Kurt Cobain. It’s a convenient hook upon which I can hang my reflections on mortality and my inability to remain squarely in the youth cult demographic which rock and roll (disingenuously) posits as its core audience. Of course rock and roll (especially the semi-popular smartipance stuff I like) has long been the weapon of choice for moody overthinkers way too old to qualify as a “kid” of any kind. As many smart folks have pointed out before me, rock and roll serves a vaguely pagan religious role for sensitive types who need meaning and ecstasy and whathaveyou. The analogies are pretty easy – the icons, the ritual of communal rock happenings, the frenzied adulation/dancing, the bedsit contemplation and adoration of pop stars, the call to authentic living, the empty going-through-motions faking it when ecstasy isn’t forthcoming.

Still, when you do see the real deal in person, the whole rock-as-religion thing makes a lot of sense. In honor of my birthday, I received a ticket to see Morrissey at the Midland Theater. I’m not going to bore you all with a show review wherein I splutter about Morrissey’s fabulousness as a performer and object of rock veneration. I just wanted to mention the frenzy that occurred when Morrissey discarded a sweaty shirt by pitching it into the crowd. Ripping. Rending. Snarling. Weeping. Mania. I was reminded of the anecdotes about newly dead saints torn to bits by relic seekers. I’ve been in hundreds of rock audiences, and rare are those audiences where actual group madness breaks out. Some performers have “it” and some don’t. Morrissey (as if anyone was still unaware) possess the ability to inspire this old time religion. Slate recently ran an interesting article about Morrissey in middle age examining the roots of his appeal. What I came away with is that the holy weirdness of Morrissey’s awkward youth.

“I’m sick of being the undiscovered genius,” scribbled the 18-year-old Steven Morrissey. “I want fame NOW not when I’m dead.” He’d have to linger in the bed-sit five more years. In the meantime, his life consisted of: the dole, writing letters to New Musical Express, reading manifestoes with titles like “Men’s Liberation” and The Female Eunuch, and taking up—and abandoning—the musical instruments traditionally associated with playing rock ‘n’ roll. At 19, he sang twice, poorly, in a band called the Nosebleeds and, refining his skills of lonely pop adulation, published two monographs—fanzine one-offs, really—one on James Dean, the other on his beloved New York Dolls. But New Year’s Eve, 1979, captures young Morrissey best: As the clock chimed midnight, alone in his bedroom, the 20-year-old Steven ushered in the 1980s by reading Pride and Prejudice.

Even more than the frenzied pagan mass of the rock show or the idol worship, the actual religious act of rock and roll practice is the time spent in the misfit wilderness of adolescence. Adolescents, historically, have not made much excellent rock music. And many of rock’s true geniuses have been the sorts of people who were weird enough that you could imagine them spending their teenhoods in pain and seclusion. Of course, the essentialness of an awkward adolescence for any true rock believer leads a lot of folks to manufacture phony bologna accounts of their troubled coming of age (See Stuff White People Like #83 and #17). Heck, I’ve got some self-mythology I can lay on you if you’ve got a few hours.

Because rock and roll – while self-involved – is not often a terribly reflective form, most of its saints are treated as savant-type shamans only barely aware of their powers. Of course this is a crock – one look a Cobain’s Journals will show that even the most authentic-seeming rock icon does a lot of intellectualizing and conceptualizing. Nevertheless, institutionalized rock and roll (the audience, press, etc.) is suspicious of thinking or trying too hard. To be seen working at it is to be, at best, inauthentic (e.g., Bowie, Beck) or, at worst, a hack or careerist.

Pete Townshend has always been an odd rock and roll star. In many ways, he helped create and promote the awkward adolescence model of rock initiation. The protagonists in Who singles like “Can’t Explain,” “I’m a Boy,” “The Kids are Alright,” “Pictures of Lily” and many, many others are screwed-up, awkward, sensitive types. Angry young men wrestling with their feelings. Townshend’s later long-form conceptual pieces Tommy and Quadrophenia are likewise about rock and roll and idolatry and alienation and junk culture. I’m sure there are plenty of second and third generation rock adherents who can’t honestly tell you where their actual teenhood ends and Townshend’s stylized myth of spiritually unmoored teen angst begins. I’m not sure if I know the difference anymore.

Because the teenhood myth is central to the religious experience of rock and roll, youth itself is often venerated in song, performance, etc. Some obvious examples are twee’s obsession with childhood or 28-year-old indie rockers referring to themselves and their peers as “kids.” There’s no good model or myth to support the adult practice of the religion of rock and roll. There’s craft – which is boring and requires chops and often leads to dull dabbling in “roots music” or jazz or Pet Sounds-style pop. Sometimes perversity or eccentricity or cult cachet can provide an escape hatch. Most often though, adulthood and rock and roll combine to form a smug, bloated arena spectacle reeking of nostalgia and reverence. Occasionally an artist (not usually an audience) will emerge from the other side of adulthood as a wild old coot still in command of his or her old spell book – Dylan is the most obvious example.

Empty Glass is (among other things) Townshend’s best effort at giving adulthood the kind of rock myth meaning that he helped create for adolescence. As with much of Townshend’s work, there’s a hefty bit of autobiography and spiritual seeking going on in Empty Glass. It’s an album about purging and transcending the pain and longing and pettiness that you accumulate once you quit being a holy dumbshit teenager. It’s a record about needing help. Empty Glass’ best-known single is a love song where God offers to fix all the crap you screwed up.

“Let My Love Open the Door” – Pearl Jam @ Soldier Field

In Townshend’s own words, the album is about hitting bottom and needing to be refilled.

And when I did my first solo album, I called it Empty Glass, ’cause of this idea that when you go to the tavern — which is to God, you know — and you ask for His love — He’s the bartender, you know — and He gives you a drink, and what you have to give Him is an empty glass. You know there’s no point giving Him your heart if it’s full already; there’s no point going to God if your heart’s full of Doris.

I suppose it is easy to imagine that we all had tortured teenhoods which we romantically endured. It’s much less heroic to admit that getting older hasn’t made things easier. Grown-ups are supposed to be on top of their personal shit. They’re not supposed to whine. They’re not supposed to be paralyzed by fear and fatigue. I think that’s why the rock and roll youth cult continues. It allows you to fantasize about a difficult trial already overcome while nostalgically ignoring today’s horrible bullshit. My mother is fond of dismissing injustice or pain in adult life with a glib “That’s just the way things are” – as if someone isn’t making it that way or as if you shouldn’t even try to change it. I think that attitude is comfortable, safe.

Seeking authenticity. Looking for answers. Breaking down. Transcending. These activities are unbecoming. They certainly don’t help you project authority and bootstrapping self-sufficiency. Angst is bad for business. Doubt seems a bit self indulgent when practiced by adults.

We live in interesting times. It can be tempting to retreat to our imaginary high school days and obsess over the now tidy concerns of bruised feelings and mussed pride and simple loneliness that seemed oppressive then. It makes the very real hurt of right now go away for a while. Still, nostalgia is a cop out. Perpetual adolescence is a cop out. I do think that rock and roll can point to some kind of personal transcendence. I think the best of it is spiritually nourishing. At the very least, it can encourage contemplation and sensitivity. Still, rock and roll does its best work in conjunction with immediacy. Yesterday’s rock and roll listening won’t do you any good today. There’s no point in coming to the bar if your glass is already full of yesterday’s fake memories.

Joe Strummer & the Mescaleros, Global A Go-Go

Thursday, April 2nd, 2009

Fears about artmaking fall into two families: fears about yourself, and fears about your reception by others. In a general way, fears about yourself prevent you from doing your best work, while fears about your reception by others prevent you from doing your own work.

David Bayles & Ted Orland in Art & Fear

This is my Indian summer…I learnt that fame is an illusion and everything about it is just a joke. I’m far more dangerous now, because I don’t care at all.

Joe Strummer to Chris Salewicz in 2000

A couple Saturdays ago, I read Art & Fear while lounging on the front porch. The weather was great and I was enjoying the opportunity to relax. However enjoyable this was, I don’t remember actually relaxing. I was mostly procrastinating. I really meant to do some writing and recording that weekend, but I didn’t. I found other things that I *had* to do. I was going to work on projects later. Of course I didn’t actually get any serious work in. I never feel good about not working. I feel like something is gnawing at me. I feel guilty for neglecting what I can best describe as this nagging, uncomfortable lump in an unreachable part of my personality somewhere. The act of writing or rehearsing or recording leaves me feeling lighter and much less prone to the heavy sulks that I indulge in after a few solid days of idleness. And if I can get started, I can usually build up some momentum and actually become increasingly productive as I keep at it. But getting started – cripes. Why do I not start? Fear mostly. Fear that something won’t work out the way I want. Fear that I’ll need to go back and edit and tweak. Fear that what I write or play or sing or record won’t live up to my own idea of how I’d like to present myself. Ego essentially – the satisfaction of perfect plans not yet tainted by poor execution. Typical creative process bullshit.

I recently read the New Yorker piece on David Foster Wallace’s depression, unfinished work, and eventual suicide that was paired with a short excerpt from his unfinished The Pale King. Wallace – according to this account – had the same doubts and frustrations about his work that I have about mine and that everyone has about their own stuff. The excerpt “Wiggle Room” seems quite well done to me, but Wallace struggled with the novel. It’s humbling to realize that even the folks you admire are unsure of themselves. It’s also tough to stomach when they can’t resolve their fears in either life or art and succumb to despair. It’s easy to brood over idols who took themselves out before they were through.

It’s easy in all this misty, mopey romanticism to overlook a guy like Joe Strummer. Here’s a guy who basically commercially shit the bed right when he should have been cashing his check for big-ticket fame and fortune. He was a washout for a decade or more. Or course he’s a legend and a punk saint now, but for a long time he was an old fart has-been.

His return to form with the Mescaleros is striking given how expansive his records were. Resurrecting that old Clash sound would’ve been an easy way to cash in on the pop punk boom of the ‘90s. But psychedelic, dance-inflected, world folk punk records hardly seem like the surefire way to recapture your audience. Of course that’s why they work so well, they’re actual art. They aren’t product. They aren’t marketing move. They’re fearless Joe Strummer records – not all that different in spirit from the Clash’s restless eclecticism.

One of the most striking of the Mescaleros-era Strummer tracks is Global A Go-Go’s leadoff track “Johnny Appleseed.” It’s a fairly straightforward number, at its heart a strummy skiffle ditty. But the arrangement, the recording is both seemingly effortless and otherworldly. The simple verse melody is bolstered by a perfect bed of ambient sounds that gives way to a joyous pan-global sonic riot at the chorus. Wordess voices wash across the track as Strummer declares that we not “…go killin’ all the bees.” It’s a phenomenally happy recording without being needlessly strident or anthemic or pushy. In short it’s not U2’s “Beautiful Day” or Springsteen’s “Working on a Dream” or countless other attempts at capital-b “Big” pop uplift. (If anything, “Johnny Appleseed” is as legitimately joyous as something like the Breeders’ “Cannonball.”) Maybe it’s because the lyric is somewhat oblique. There’s some nostalgia hinted at – Appleseed himself, MLK, a Buick ’49 – as well as a bittersweet warning that you should take care not to do in the source of your honey. It’s a human song, an honest song, a worldly and adult song. It doesn’t preach, but it doesn’t candy coat either.

Lord, there goes a Buick forty-nine
Black sheep of the angels riding, riding down the line
We think there is a soul, we don’t know
That soul is hard to find

I find it fitting that “Johnny Appleseed” became the theme for David Milch’s lovely John from Cincinnati, which among other things is about getting over yourself, moving beyond your brokenness, and opening yourself to the possibility of the divine/transcendental/miraculous. When you go to the big board, that is after all what creating stuff is about – being human and sharing your little bit of the human experience with other people. The desire to be perfect, to be all things, to present yourself as shiny and perfect and special can be crippling. It also makes you a jerk sometimes. What is inspiring to me about a guy like Strummer or Dylan is how they managed to come out the other side of fame and failure with the ability to communicate that sweetly tart success of being able to get up and keep working on one’s own terms regardless of what previous, fleeting success they once had.

Suppose if you’re too concerned with weighing the issue of burning out/fading away question that you just stop, you’ll never really know what you had. It’s like killing the bees that make your honey.