Archive for June, 2009

The Watersons, Frost and Fire: A Calendar of Ritual and Magical Songs

Monday, June 29th, 2009

In a completely unseasonal move, not too long ago I read two cultural histories of Halloween — Nicolas Rogers’ Halloween: From Pagan Ritual to Party Night and David J. Skal’s Death Makes a Holiday. Both books look at the grab bag of vaguely Anglo-Celtic traditions that merged with American-style commercialism, graphic design, mass media, and vandalism to produce the current late-October retail juggernaut. Along the way, both authors provide refreshers on bonfire night, Old World recreational fortune-telling practices, queer appropriations of Halloween masking, poison candy urban legends, and the like. If, like me, you’re a long time Halloween nerd, none of this is uncharted territory. One thing that did “click” for me was that (and I believe the Rogers book pointed this out) the festival from whence Halloween came (Hallowtide) was actually the beginning of Christmastide. Of course, the old timey Anglo-Celtic Christmas season was quite a different celebration than our current partly-Victorian-inspired carnival of wholesome consumerism.

Christmas, once upon a time, involved a lot more pranking, public rowdiness, and general transgressing than today’s “traditional” time of family get-togethers and material displays of affection. Various house-visiting practices and charity/begging took place across this long post-harvest holiday season. Souling and wassailing practices are often seen as the origins of modern trick-or-treating and caroling traditions. These now exotic traditions highlighted the places where the liturgical and agricultural calendars intersect. In today’s culture of commerce and Pop-focused mass media, “traditions” are usually just wholesome veneers constructed to support consumer practices. Any deep-rooted symbolism is often obscured by images and stories originating in cola advertisements or department store promotions.

Frost and Fire is an interesting collection, focusing as it does on the “Calendar of Ritual and Magical Songs” that was used to commemorate traditional seasonal celebrations. Of course, this album is a product of ‘60s “folk revival” tastes and ‘60s ideas about “authenticity.” I’m not really purist on these matters and certainly not an expert on British folk music/revival. What is appealing about this collection for me is that, to my rock/pop ears, the unaccompanied, roughish vocal harmonies singing of birds and wine and such sounds exactly how I imagine my beloved imaginary past to sound. It’s very “Olde England,” but unpretentiously without the curlicues and sonic adornments that connote Renaissance Fair. The overall effect is sort of a Plastic Ono Band version of medieval-ish ritual – a “Strange, Fey England” counterpart to the “Old, Weird America” found on the Anthology of American Folk Music and re-imagined by Dylan and his Band on the Basement Tapes.

I suppose that it’s fitting that these songs harkening back to liminal-season rituals also suggest the transition from a world where unique pre-industrial European and American traditional/regional practices existed in isolated pockets to a world where almost everything (including “tradition”) is mediated (by electronics, expectations, pop stardom, hype, etc.) such that entertainment and ritual are influenced by a commercial monoculture. I’m not lamenting the passing of some purer, simpler time – an era which likely never existed (or if it did exist was probably a trifle inconvenient and not nearly as quaint as I imagine it). Rather, I am interested in the ways which historical or traditional cultural memes mutate and live on. The self-consciously rustic Frost and Fire helps to organize ideas about seasons and traditional celebrations so that listeners can understand what they mean and how they function – much in the same way that Halloween helps Americans organize and understand immigrant traditions and pranking traditions and “fancy dress” parties that gave rise to the very American modern Halloween holiday.

I’ve listened to this album a lot since I bought it last year. Still, I can’t quite make sense of it or boil it down like I’d normally do with a record by a pop/rock group. I keep going back to it. Perhaps I’m being sentimental and don’t want to have at something that “seems timeless” or whatever. There’s a clarity to this album and to the nasal ring of the Watersons’ co-mingling voices.

Jarvis Cocker, Further Complications

Monday, June 1st, 2009

“I’m alive but I plan to die in the future”

A couple weeks ago I re-watched Todd Haynes’ Velvet Goldmine, the quasi-biographical examination of British glam artists who may or may not bear a striking resemblance to David Bowie, Iggy Pop, Marc Bolan, Brian Ferry, et al. Much like Haynes’ better received, better realized Dylan “biopic” I’m Not There, Velvet Goldmine mostly contrasts the liberating extra-factual mythology of rock and roll with the dourness of fact-hampered “reality.” Goldmine’s Citizen Kane construction lets viewers to muddle through the drab, phony fascist 1984 of the film’s events between numerous flashbacks that paint the early British ‘70s as an exuberant, sweaty, glittersmacked paradise. The “then was better than now” thesis is made visually obvious. There’s also a whole lot going on rock-trivia-nerd-wise, queer-theory-wise, and even Ewan-McGregor-as-Cobain-as-Iggy-Pop-wise. Still, without going down the fabulous glitter rock rabbit hole, I was really taken by the glamour vs. banality dichotomy Haynes sets up.

Particularly, I was struck by how totally Jarvis Cocker, both on his own and at the helm of Pulp, blurs the line between the two. His work seems mainly concerned with the banality of glamour and the glamorousness of banality. After all, Pulp’s biggest number was a class-baiting song about slumming.

My absolute favorite Pulp record is This is Hardcore – a dark glam record about sexual frustration, aging and death. Further Complications plays like a companion piece to that record. Where Hardcore was all lush Roxy Music lechery, Complications sounds like the first Stooges record – thanks in part to Steve Albini’s hi-fi but no frills engineering, I’m sure. It’s a wiry record. Hardcore was a hangover record, comedown, a waking up in your own fluids ordeal. Complications main thrust (heh) is about carrying on in the face of decay and adversity. It’s about finding something fabulous in doing all the ordinary, ugly crap we all have to keep doing if we’re still going to bother suck air every day.


From “Leftovers”

Trapped in a body that is failing me
Well, please allow me to be succinct
I wanna love you whilst we both still have flesh upon our bones
Before we both become extinct

Pop – with all its sex and glamour and generalized shakin’ it – is a young person’s game. And “young” is becoming younger all the time. It’s a con, of course. That’s what glamour is – a trick. It’s a fey spell. An enchantment. It’s the sort of thing that you chase like the Will o’ the Wisp only to wind up waist deep in the mire. Further Complications is the sound of dispelling the myth of pop.


From “I Never Said I Was Deep”

My morality is shabby, my behaviour unacceptable
No, I’m not looking for a relationship, just a willing receptacle

From “Fuckingsong”

I will never get to touch you so I wrote this song instead
Thinking about you lying in bed, it’s gonna get inside your head
And it’s the best that I can do, this is the closest I could get
So let it penetrate your consciousness

Essentially, Cocker is taking the whole business of pop stardom apart – the big sexual metaphor behind the curtain – and laying all the parts out on a tarp, precisely labeled. Of course it’s not just about the lyrics. A lot of the same ideas are communicated by the direct, unfussy rock sounds and structures upon which Cocker’s hung his lyrics. And Cocker’s vocal performances are certainly a bit more harried and exposed than on his more pop stuff. Heck, Jarvis himself summed up his theory in a 2008 lecture he gave on pop lyrics.


My core argument is that lyrics don’t really matter – they’re an optional extra, much like a sunroof or a patio. But when music and lyrics work together they’re better than the sum of parts. But that’s not all there is to it. Here’s the 1971 promo video from David Bowie’s Heroes which’ll illustrate my basic equation:

Music + Lyrics + Performance = Dynamite

Much like a film (perhaps Velvet Goldmine) a pop song is built of several parts and may wind up better than all of them. The meaning is somewhere is in the operation of the mechanism and not necessarily in the components themselves. Seems like an apt description of any human endeavor.

“It’s a complicated boogie” and all that.