Archive for the ‘R.E.M.’ Category

Kanye West, 808s & Heartbreak

Wednesday, December 3rd, 2008

I have a soft spot for phony records — what I like to call “false rock.” I’ve thrown this term around for a few years without ever defining it. Wimpily, I usually fell back on the “I know it when I hear it” excuse whenever anyone has asked me what exactly I meant by “false rock.” For instance, Ryan Adams’ Rock’N’Roll is a false rock record. R.E.M.’s Monster, too. And U2’s Zooropa. T. Rex’s Electric Warrior might be as well.

Before anyone gets in a huff, please note that I desperately love these records. They’re some of my very favorite records. They’re near perfect. They contain an entire WORLD within them, or rather they contain an entire set where you might film a movie about a totally artificial and fantastic world populated by robots and laser mice and witty holograms. What I’d say these albums have in common is their obvious, intentional bigness. Also, they’re not “serious” records in terms being overly concerned with songcraft per se. These records have some very good songs on them, but they don’t strike me as fussy, over-considered songs. Rather these “false rock” records strike me as inspired elaborations on a conceptualized sound. They seem like pop art experiments in a way, attempts to make something both shockingly individual and fully commercial. Just consider the boldness of the titles and the album covers. They’re very direct. Iconic almost. Like a cereal box or pop can.

null

In many ways the flatness, the brightness of the music and packaging of these “false rock” albums seems Warholian to me. It’s overtly Pop stuff. Maybe this is what seems phony or “false” to me, this emphasis on surface and boldness and stylized commerciality.

As sounds, as packages, these big fake albums are big on allusion. On Monster, Stipe throws around references to Dan Rather and Kurt Cobain and finally offers to “be your Iggy Pop” over sound beds obviously cribbed from glam rock and grunge. The title track from Zooropa is lousy with pilfered ad slogans and sounds from Bowie and Eno’s Berlin period. Adams’ Rock’N’Roll is the sound of a once-upon-a-time enfant terrible mimicking the sounds of retro/revivalist bands whose best ideas belong to decades long past. And nevermind that Adams gives a number of his smartipance tracks the same title as established rock classics/hits.

And Electric Warrior – this record could very well be the source of “false rock” with its rockabilly-meets-American-Top-40-meets-Dylanesque-wordplay-meets-psychedelia choogle. It’s a record that is so very much EVERYTHING that it winds up as no one thing in particular. Electric Warrior is a clever album. It challenges you to a game of spot the influences. And it’s a certainly bit camp. I suppose that campiness is something all proper “false rock” albums share. Perhaps “false rock” is merely my own way of talking about records that employ the glam rock techniques established by Electric Warrior (i.e., self-awareness, campiness, lyrical and musical allusiveness, knowing post-modern simplicity/minimalism, etc.) outside of the narrow time and place of glittermania and T.Rextasy as going concerns.

Why all this dilly-dallying? What do these boring old rock records have to do with the Kanye West’s 808s & Heartbreak and its well-known, oft-reported back-story? Well, I suppose I’m trying to work through my little “false rock” concept because 808s & Heartbreak is, by my reckoning, a “false rock” album much more than it is a forlorn break-up record or a soul-bearing “fucked-up superstar” record. It’s a stylized, Pop Art version of a bleak, sad record. I’m not saying that West wasn’t feeling bad when he made it, but his sad robot music doesn’t have the real emotional fire and sonic raggedness of Joy Division’s Closer or Lennon’s Plastic Ono Band or Nirvana’s In Utero or Neil Young’s Tonight’s the Night. Nor does this record have the clarity and bitterness of my very favorite break-up record Blood on the Tracks. West, by my ears, just doesn’t sound at the end of his rope on 808s. He’s simply wearing an expertly-crafted designer mope mask.

One of the reasons why I find Kanye West compelling as a pop star is because he seems to be consciously angling for the role of hip hop’s Elvis Costello – the smart, winking artist with a firm grasp of pop history and a willingness to toy with convention. I like glam and punk because they’re forms based on breaking the fourth wall. And I like West because he’s willing to break mainstream hip hop’s pretentious, cred-obsessed fourth wall.

808s finds West intensifying his expressions of ambivalence towards to the conventions of hip hop boasting and materialism – an ambivalence that has always been part of his shtick. E.g. from “Welcome to Heartbreak”: “My friend shows me pictures of his kids/And all I could show him was pictures of my cribs.” Under the usual circumstances of a “typical” Kanye West offering, I’d consider this admission as just another snippet tucked in amongst the party songs and the wild hyperbole as a way to reinforce his image as a self-aware, conflicted artist. But within the context of 808s & Heartbreak’s complete image/sonic overhaul, I find it interesting that the one previously-established element of West’s persona that carries over into this new construction is his vision of himself as isolated superstar, as Midas imprisoned in/by his golden kingdom.

I suppose what put my on the scent of 808s & Heartbreak as a “false rock” record was its being an album-length exercise in image overhaul. Like the previously mentioned albums, 808s finds an established artist remaking himself by picking out new influences and then packaging his new identity for ready consumption. It’s not enough for West to dabble in vintage synths and Daft Punk samples. He has to doll himself up in a little grey New Wave suit and retro glasses.

Don't let the bullies take my lunch money!

He’s playing the Sad Black Prince to Bowie’s alienated Thin White Duke. If the dance-inflected mope, wavering vocals, and vaguely post-punk feel of tracks like “Say You Will” and “Love Lockdown” weren’t enough to suggest New Order, West makes his Factory Records influence apparent with an album cover that could comfortably sit on the shelf next to Power, Corruption, and Lies.

808s & Heartbreak

808s & Heartbreak

Power, Corruption, and Lies

Power, Corruption, and Lies

In short, this album that is being billed as intensely personal and “private” is actually a bit of studied simplicity and artificial sound meant to reimagine the public West as a pop star who has been transformed by personal loss and emotional darkness. It’s a neat trick – making yourself sound cold to appear warmer for having done so. After the first five bleak cuts on 808s, the poppy respite of “Paranoid” and the soaring phony strings and fake-Springsteen xylophone on “Robocop” are wholly refreshing.

By claiming emotional turmoil, West is able to jump genres and become a new pop star unfettered by the expectations of hip hop success/convention. He’s making a bid for art rock cred by making an art rock record that pushes all the right buttons (i.e., the right influences, thematic cohesiveness, personal pain fueling the creative process). If you have any understanding of pop culture, you can see what he’s up to. Still, it’s fun to hear. Perhaps I’m perverse, but I think I enjoy 808s & Heartbreak more for being able to see how it’s put together. I think that’s part of the kick I get out of these “false rock” records – they’re obvious and honest in their obviousness. You can see the artists at work, as they creating a commercial collage without the usual pretense of art being some kind of personal accident born of mysterious specialness.

R.E.M., Monster

Thursday, July 3rd, 2008

I am currently unemployed. Don’t worry – I planned on it. Part of the whole relocating to KC plan factored some time spent out on the asphalt flats stalking a new job. Plus this relatively short bout of joblessness has given me a chance to get back to my roots as a ‘90s-style slacker. It’s been enlightening in a way to soak in my own stasis. I’ve been reminded that I don’t do “nothing” very well. After a week or two of late hour showers, judge shows, and refrigerator pizza, I’ve started to get a bit rammy. I did manage to devote a nice chunk of yesterday to Beavis and Butthead on DVD – so apparently some things can still switch off the Type A for a bit. I’ve also been working at overachieving on some stupid online RPG. Like I said, I’ve been reliving my ‘90s adolescence. I’ve yet to spend six hours shuffling around the mall, and I haven’t eaten any Taco Bell. Obviously, I need to do tweak the nuances of my personal time travel techniques.

Perhaps it’s turning 30 or an ongoing narcissistic obsession with the ephemera of my stupid adolescence, but I’ve noticed that the Record Desk has been particularly ‘90s-centric since we set sail on the seas of sound a couple months ago. I’d like to blame all this crawling-up-my-own-ass-to-spelunk-my-way-back-to-fifteen-years-ago on some kind of critical personal failing, but really I’ve not found anything new that quite pulls my trigger lately. I admit that *maybe* I’ve wusstastically retreated back to the snuggly and secure past where everything makes sense to my sorry old self. But in reality, I think what I’m up against is a world that is less fun and more sucky than the ‘90s.

Like any good Xer-identifying X/Y-cusp kid, I realize that one of the great crimes of the boomers was their wholesale inability to get beyond the warm rose-colored glow of the whole “Spirit of the ‘60s” thing. And it seems that I myself am dancing perilously close to the flame of “You had to be there, dude.”

I suppose that I’ve been dwelling on that dumb, rotten, abominable Weezer record. Yesterday I was perusing the AV Club’s Best Songs of 2008 So Far feature, and they provided an embedded version of the “Pork and Beans” video. Being a glutton for punishment, I decided to see what kind of video shenanigans were in store for Weezer circa 2008. As I’m sure you savvy folks all know, the video features a goodly number of wacky YouTube people doing their shtick as part of some Weezerific po-mo jumble. I had NO first hand experience of these YouTubers, mind you. They were all just things I’d read about or glanced briefly at out on the fell blog-swamp of the internet. And that’s when I realized that Weezer (and by extension the whole ‘90s self-referential, pop-culture-addled sensibility) has outlived its usefulness, morphing into something even more quirk-obsessed and self-congratulatory than even the smuggest *wink-nudge* Mike Myers “Hey, did you get my joke” bit. Rather than mere Happy Days pastiche or even a Muppet Show tribute, the “Pork and Beans” video is a riot of “Hey, you remember this thing from last month’s internet, right?!” It’s all light sabers, dancing bananas, geographically-challenged beauty queens and crying, Britney-defending guys.

“Pork and Beans”

UPDATE — The video is no longer available as embedded content. Click here to link out to the video.

Basically, now that the whole “Royale with Cheese” bit is more than a decade and a half old, comedy by way of smugly mentioning things that people have heard of has mostly worn out its welcome. I can’t so much claim this realization as my own. In fact, I ran a much smarter-sounding but dumber-in-reality hypothesis by my wife who set me straight. Basically her argument about the ‘90s is that once upon a time some meta-flavored, referential-type things were kind of new and funny and charming. Then teenage boys (or perhaps boys in general) glommed onto this style and ran it into the ground by quoting snippets and self-involvedly repeating tales of their own boy-type exploits as if they were just as clever as their beloved movie snippets.

And I was all like, “Well, what about that time Matt kicked Byron square in the ass and we were all like ‘Um, you kicked his ass. Heh, heh.’” My wife rolled her eyes, and admitted that I pretty much “bent my wookie” in this attempt at smartness and insight. In short, I am part of the problem – because I am a boy and because I often mistake my own knowing about and mantra-like repeating of garbage that ANYONE can rent or download for some kind of towering personal achievement.

I suppose that I lazily attribute my tremendous Simpsons-quoting and Star Wars-joke-getting abilities to coming of age in the fat and meaningless Clinton years. I mean, I *am* a product of the ‘90s. I *had* to become this particular kind of terminally adolescent, intellectually-lightweight dillweed. If one buys the overall cultural myth, me and millions of semi-smart guys like me were basically pumped full of the mental/emotional equivalent of Twinkie filling before being pitched into the fearsome sea of dread that is Geo. W. Bush’s Amurrica. Of course, my gut tells me to blame the boomers – to blame them for slathering me in advertising and action figures, to blame them for setting unrealistic expectations of youth culture groundswell, to blame them for accepting a way of life that forces me to park my ass in a little beige cubicle, pretending to work.

Convinced of my own specialness and of my own generational victimhood, I decided to go back to *the* album that most reminds me of my beloved 1990s.

For the record, I absolutely love Monster. It hit me at a time before I was overly concerned about whether or not a given album was “the band’s best” or was “well received.” It’s an album that I love viscerally. I know every fuzzy, feedback-drenched cranny. Each vocal inflection is burned into my brain in orange and black and violent green. I can feel each drum fill and bass whump coming about eight bars away. I can’t even begin to estimate how many times I’ve heard this record. I expected that a really close “reading” of this very ‘90s album would reveal all manner of referential ‘90s-style disingenuousness.

I apparently heard this album so many times that I forgot what it was about. I’d mixed it up with my own teenaged rememberings, my own lousy personal mythology. Obviously, “What’s the Frequency, Kenneth?” references a specific attack on Dan Rather, but not as a winking sort of smartipance thing – more as a springboard for a trip down the rabbit hole to a place where pop culture is a sprawling, confusing canker. The album is obsessed with poses and manufactured identity and sexual politics. It’s an attempt to retain authenticity and self in a world that demands artifice and self-aggrandizement.

“I Took Your Name”

I’ll be your albatross,
devil dog, Jesus Lord
I don’t wanna be Iggy Pop,
but if that’s what it takes

Even “Let Me In” (a.k.a. the song about dead Kurt Cobain) is an honest plaint – not a coy rockstar move. I suppose I forgot that much of what the ‘90s were about was the at times embarrassing expression of raw emotion – the so fucking what/everything matters dichotomy outlined ever so subtly in the 1994 film S.F.W. All that “whatever, nevermind” aloofness was a cover for hurt feelings and unsureness and general existential dread in a world where one wrong decision or flunked test could ruin your chances forever.

In a way R.E.M. was a special band for me because they were older and seemed cooler and their songs were oblique enough that you had to work at figuring them out. They operated according to a different set of rules than regular long-haired rock bands. They seemed smart. And they offered a way out and through. They were non-conformist but not self-destructive. Essentially, they were a model of how you could grow up without dumbing down or ignoring stuff that was grey or troubling. I guess I got that intuitively when I was a stupid teenager. And now that I’m older, I suppose my tendency is to worship my own stupid teenage behavior – a trap that will leave me as lame as “The Red Album” if I don’t watch it.

I guess that my wife’s reminder that boys are stupid and yesterday’s Beavis and Butthead marathon was a swift kick in the pants. I shouldn’t ever get too pleased with my own cleverness. Cleverness is almost always a cover for some kind of gnawing uncertainty or hurt or dissatisfaction – a smart and sensitive version of the macho strutting that “alternative” culture supposedly dismantled forever and ever (or at least until Fred Durst showed up).

If the ‘90s had a central thesis, it was that people mostly kind of suck because they are stupid and hurtful and wounded and pretentious. This kind of misanthropy has fallen out of favor because it requires that folks employ uncool things like political correctness and “awareness,” admitting that we might be assholes ourselves. It’s tempting always to be the clever bastard with a snappy comeback. But deep down, we know that this kind of arrogance leads nowhere good.

Gee Dub Gives the Single Finger Salute

“Irony is the shackles of youth.”

R.E.M., Accelerate

Monday, April 7th, 2008

Tomorrow I will turn 30. I’m looking forward to it — a bit strange given how I’ve thought of all the birthdays between 20 and 29. I have this really long story that I like to tell about my 16th birthday. Frankly, it’s become increasingly maudlin cornerstone of my personal mythology. Long story short, my parents kinda ignored my 16th birthday because I was on an embarrassing marching band trip to Disney World. And after marching in the illuminated parade and dealing with all sorts of petty teenage emotional crap and school-related disciplinary nonsense, I found out that Kurt Cobain killed himself. As a result, I became very interested in Nirvana and usually spend the week of my birthday musing about suicide and how I should’ve done the proper thing and not lived beyond 27.

For some reason, I couldn’t get myself all worked up and mopey this year. I think passing from “it’s still possible” youngness into certifiable adulthood has taken the edge off. Which leads me to the reason why I’m writing about a late-period R.E.M. album. At some point in the last decade or so, during the promo cycle for one of their post-Monster albums, I remember hearing Peter Buck answer a question about getting old in rock and roll with something along the lines of “When you’re young, you do a lot of stuff on instinct. As you get older, you have to use your brain more to make up for your instincts.” I remember thinking that this was a fairly smart assessment, and — given that I’ve always been partial to using my noggin — it gives me hope that I’m well prepared as I enter my dotage.

Still, as someone whose medium of choice for interacting with the world is rock and roll, the idea of getting older is gut-level troubling. I’m a little scared that unnamed forces will sneak into my room tonight and write a big three-oh on my forehead in black Sharpie — lest anyone who holds dear that old Boomer adage about not trusting anyone over 30 be fooled. And given the sometimes fleeting merits of R.E.M.’s last two brains-over-instinct efforts Reveal and Around the Sun, I’d sort of written Mr. Buck’s comment off as merely rationalizing his band’s departure into the fussily produced, slightly dull sunset.

Accelerate, however, is an inspiration. I know that’s like saying a late-period Stones album is “an inspiration,” but I’m really enjoying this new disc. It’s a terse, smart album that plays to the band’s strengths and resists the temptation to “stay current” by piling on the electronic blips and twitters. Within the “youth rock” press (or blogosphere, if you must), I’ve seen an overall trend to downplay the merits of standard, rock-type music while focusing on how certain approved-of elements are untypical. But honestly, I didn’t start listening to rock and roll because it was weird or difficult or because it eschewed traditional songform. In general, I like the sound of the whole words + guitar equation.

I’m a little afraid that my current preoccupation with the clarity and directness of “Horse to Water” and “Living Well is the Best Revenge” is nothing by lazy listening and old age getting the better of me. But when I was a teenager, the things that really turned me on were smartipance rock songs oozing with loud, shimmery guitars anchored a solid backbeat. The bands I’ve really gone nuts for in my 20s — the White Stripes, the Libertines, Babyshambles, Trail of Dead, the Drive-by Truckers — are all working with these same basic ingredients. I guess I’m just too old to play at being bored by rock and roll.

Deep down, I know Kurt would understand.